top of page

Lostine River Corridor Logging: Lament and a Promise

This article was originally published on the author Marina Richie's blog at and is republished her with her permission. Marina Richie serves on GHCC's Board of Directors.

Courtesy Rob Klavins, Oregon Wild

How often do we circle back to the places we tried to save and could not? What is it to bear witness? What is it to know the meaning of a “shifting baseline?” What can we learn and apply to future efforts to save intact forests– storing massive amounts of carbon; acting like cooling towers in the heat of accelerating climate change; harboring biodiversity; and serving as critical wildlife corridors?

For those who were told that logging the lush, verdant corridor of the Wild & Scenic Lostine River surrounded on three sides by the Eagle Cap Wilderness was imperative for wildfire safety, what is this logging achieving?

“It’s not as bad as I thought it would be.” “Senseless destruction.” “A weakened ecosystem with far less resiliency to wildfire than before.” “Where are the standing wildlife snags? “Why did they cut the biggest trees?”

These were some of the comments from a recent August field trip to see the logging–so far. The “project” is far from over, with logging only completed to the Williamson Campground and then will continue up the corridor to the Two Pan Trailhead. What you can see now is the way it’s playing out–without much rhyme or reason if the goal was wildfire safety. It looks more like cherry-picking as many commercially valuable trees as possible and leaving a more vulnerable corridor to wildfire than before.

Thanks to the efforts of Greater Hells Canyon Council (proud to be a board member), Oregon Wild, and many individuals who spoke up, the U.S. Forest Service did reduce the scope of the logging. I wrote about the Lostine in two different blogs, the first in 2017 called “Not Lost Yet: Saving the Lostine Corridor” and in 2018, “If Otters Could Vote– Yes on Saving the Lostine!

Last winter, the logging started on snow, which is a better time to log for preventing soil damage, but it’s still pretty awful to see. We scratched our heads in puzzlement and dismay. Why did this go forward?

March 2021 Lostine logging. Courtesy Rob Klavins, Oregon Wild.

I’ve assembled a selection of before and after photos to get a sense of the loss. Driving by doesn’t do it justice. You have to get out and wade through the slash and downed trees to experience the change. You have to feel the difference between the cool forests adjacent to the logging and the now exposed, dried out remnants.

Thinning? I think most people consider this means a light touch. But “thinning” can mean taking out many trees and most of the big ones if it's a commercial sale. Treating all forests as one-size-fits-all fails to respect the highly evolved ecosystems, where dynamic fire systems have long played critical roles. I won’t get into it here, except to say, we must change the paradigm and focus wildfire safety measures where they matter–closest to where people live. Tearing up the fabric of mature and ancient forests and the elegant underground “wood-wide-web” is an act of hubris.

Our magnificent forests are not rows of corn. Let’s start to honor them. At the end of the blog, I’ll list some further reading on the subject, and an action you to take to support The River Democracy Act.

We lament the loss. We promise to never give up on saving our precious remaining wildlands.

Ready for the photos? I’ll let you judge for yourself.

First–for those who don’t know the beauty of the Lostine River of Northeast Oregon, here is an aerial photo and a map with the corridor outlined where the logging is happening and the surrounding Eagle Cap Wilderness in green. Note that the wilderness boundary could have come up to the cherry-stem road, but when the lines were drawn, someone decided to make them a quarter mile from the road (with a handshake promise to manage that corridor as de facto wilderness). The promise was broken with the Lostine logging.

Now for the before and after.

This is what a lush forest of larch and fir should look like—cool, verdant, layered, with downed logs that are not fire hazards, but are rejuvenating the soils, offering pathways for pine martens, and sheltering delicate flowers and plants, including orchids. This photo is one I took during a field trip with the Forest Service back in 2016. They flagged a sample unit to show us the trees that would be left–with everything else cut down.
Afterwards (may not be the exact location, but close).
Before—in 2018, a grand fir far from the road marked as a “hazard” tree, meaning in the way of the logging.
This is the same tree—cut down last winter and more than 230 years old.
Lostine understory summer 2018.
Understory? Post-logging August 2021 Lostine.
GHCC field trip August 2018 near Williamson Campground on the Lostine within a proposed logging unit.
GHCC field trip in 2021 near Williamson Campground (see road in distance)–not exactly a picnic spot.
GHCC field trip 2018–wondering why this orange-marked tree is marked to be saved (note most everything else to be logged in this picture, except the orange-marked trees–thinning?).
One more after the logging shot—GHCC field trip 2021.

I am also adding a few more of the March 2021 active logging on the Lostine photos, courtesy of Rob Klavins, Oregon Wild.

Courtesy of Rob Klavins, Oregon Wild.
Courtesy of Rob Klavins, Oregon Wild.
Courtesy of Rob Klavins, Oregon Wild.

Further Reading:

To read a relevant article by Chad Hanson now, see: Logging in disguise: How forest thinning is making wildfires worse.



Featured Posts
bottom of page